From CCH — another reminder that having an independent contractor agreement is not conclusive if the relationship of the parties is more like an employer/employee —
Despite having entered into an agreement titled “Independent Contractor Agreement (Co-op)” with the company to deliver auto parts to its customers, the claimant was not independently established in a trade, occupation, profession, or business. Although the claimant operated his own vehicle and could realize a profit or loss separately from the company, he had not owned a delivery business prior to their relationship, did not have a business license, had not advertised his delivery services, and had not intended to establish an independent business. The board determined that the factors indicating that the claimant was not independently established were more compelling than the factors suggesting that he was.
Read the full story at Utah claimant an employee despite independent contractor agreement
- Utah claimant an employee despite independent contractor agreement – CCH (hr.cch.com)
- Can Your Independent Contractors be Deemed to be Employees? (nathansgibson.org)
- Another Logistics and Delivery Company Found to Have Misclassified its Drivers as Independent Contractors (nathansgibson.org)
- Delivery drivers are employees, not independent contractors, Ninth Circuit rules (nathansgibson.org)