Employee or Independent Contractor?

Handy Worker Files Suit, Claims She Made Only $14 For 30 Hours Of Work

Handy website

From Fast Company, Sarah Kessler reports that a woman who worked for Handy has claimed that she was misclassified as an independent contractor and should have been an employee.  Sarah writes:

In the wake of a California court’s ruling last month that Uber misclassified a former driver as an independent contractor, a Massachusetts woman named Maisha Emmanuel has filed a similar lawsuit against on-demand cleaning service Handy.

In the proposed class action suit, Emmanuel—who started working for Handy in May this year—says that the company treated its workers like employees by imposing detailed requirements on their work, grading them and maintaining the option to terminate them based on its rules. “The cleaners’ services are fully integrated into Handy’s business, and without the cleaners, Handy’s business would not exist,” the filing reads.

Meanwhile, the lawsuit argues, Handy passes on many of the costs of doing business to the workers, by classifying them as independent contractors. Emmanuel says, for example, that she was required to work for free to reimburse the company for the cost of her cleaning supplies—and, as a result, only made $14 for her first 30 hours of work.

The claims are similar to a lawsuit filed by Handy workers in California in October, as well as suits brought against companies like Uber and Lyft. In fact, Uber just filed an opposing motion to a class-action suit today….

Read the full story at Handy Worker Files Suit, Claims She Made Only $14 For 30 Hours Of Work 

Back to Top